Sunday, March 28, 2021

Ophir

Ophir
Thomas Allen
King Solomon built a fleet of ships at Ezion Geber, which is near Eloth on the shore of the Red Sea, in the land of Edom. And Hiram sent with the fleet his servants, seamen who were familiar with the sea, together with the servants of Solomon; and they went to Ophir, and brought from there gold, to the amount of four hundred and twenty talents; and they brought it to King Solomon. (1 Kings 9:26–28)

Ophir was famous for its gold: “. . . three thousand talents of gold, of the gold of Ophir . . .” (1 Chronicles 29:4) and, also, Isaiah 13:12, “I will make men more rare than fine gold, and mankind than the gold of Ophir.” Psalm 45:9 reads, “. . . at your right hand stands the queen in gold of Ophir.” Job 28:16 reads, “It cannot be valued in the gold of Ophir. . . .” Other verses mention Ophir concerning gold.
To voyage from Ezion-Geber to Ophir and back required three years: “For the king had a fleet of ships of Tarshish at sea with the fleet of Hiram. Once every three years the fleet of ships of Tarshish used to come bringing gold, silver, ivory, apes, and peacocks [or baboons]” (1 Kings 10:22). Ezion-Geber was a seaport of Edom (Idumaea) on the northern extremity of the Gulf of Aqaba near modern Aqaba and Eilat (Elat) and was part of Solomon’s kingdom.
Ophir must have been a port and located where ivory, apes, and peacocks (or baboons) were naturally available or could be imported. Several locations have been proposed for Ophir. They are the Arabian Peninsula, India, southern East Africa, Malaysia, and Peru.
1. The Arabian Peninsula is the most popular location, although people disagree where on the peninsula Ophir is located.
One possibility is the southwest coast along the Red Sea, where gold was once mined. Thus, Ophir was located in modern-day Yemen. According to Genesis 10:29, Ophir was adjacent to Havilah and Jobab and was associated with the Queen of Sheba (1 King 10:1–10), “the queen of the south” (Matthew 12:42). Ophir may have included part of the adjacent African coast. In ancient times, Yemen was known for its gold production. (To traverse the length of the Red Sea and return should have taken much less than three years. An excuse offered for taking three years is that the ships had to halt when the weather became excessively hot.) Unger, Fausset, Davis, and the Millers favor this location.
Another proposed location is southern Arabia (modern-day Oman) bordering the India Ocean. Smith favors this location.
Still, another possible location of Ophir is between Susa and the Persian Gulf. Because of the winds, a voyage from Ezion-Geber to this location and back might have taken three years. (If this was the location of Ophir, then overland caravans would have been quicker.) Thayer favors this location.
2. India offers several possibilities for the home of Ophir. Favoring India is the algum or almug tree, which is apparently sandalwood, a native of India. Also, the other products mentioned being obtained in Ophir are found in India.
One of the proposed locations of Ophir is the Malabar Coast near Goa. Another possible location is the east side of the Indus River delta. If this is the correct location, the gold of Ophir would have come from Kashmir. Josephus favors the Indus River delta.
3. Several locations along the east coast of Africa have been suggested. They range from the Red Sea to Mashonaland (a region in Zimbabwe). The ruins found in Zimbabwe have been offered as the location of Ophir. Gold has been mined in this area. However, Sofala, an old but now ruined port in Mozambique, which was once known for exporting gold, is a more logical location.
4. Mount Ophir in Johor, Malaysia, is a possible location. This area is known for producing gold. Three years may be needed to journey to here from Ezion-Geber and back.
5. Dankenbring presents the most speculative location of Ophir: Peru. In the evidence that he gives to support Peru is that hieroglyphs on tablets similar to those used in Solomon’s time have been found in Peru and Brazil. Moreover, gold was abundant in ancient Peru. Traveling from the northern part of the Red Sea to Peru and back certainly would have required three years.
Although the location of Ophir is not known and may never be known with certainty, many places have been offered as possible locations. They include Arabia, India, Africa, Malaysia, and Peru.

References
Dankenbring. William F. Beyond Star Wars. Omak, Washington: Triumph Prophetic Ministries 2009.

Davis. John D. A Dictionary of the Bible. Fourth Revised Edition. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House, 1957.

Davis, John D. The Westminster Dictionary of the Bible. Revised by Henry Snyder Gehman. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: 1944.

Fausset, A.R. Fausset’s Bible Dictionary. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1949.

Miller, Madeleine S. and J. Lane Miller. Harper’s Bible Dictionary. 6th ed. New York, New York: Harper & Brothers, Publishers, 1959.

Smith, William. A Dictionary of the Bible. Revised and edited by F. N. and M. A. Peloubet. Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1979.

Thayer, Charles S. “Ophir.” A New Standard Bible Dictionary. Melanchthon W, Jacobus, Edward E. Norse, and Andrew C. Zenos, editors. New York, New York: Funk & Wagnalls Co., 1926.

Unger, Merrill F. Unger’s Bible Dictionary. 3rd edition. Chicago, Illinois: Moody Press, 1960.

Copyright © 2021 by Thomas Coley Allen.

Saturday, March 20, 2021

Some Comparisons of Bidenites with Deplorables

Some Comparisons of Bidenites with Deplorables

Thomas Allen


The following compares Bidenites with Deplorables. (Bidenites are the supporters, promoters, and owners of Biden  the Usurper and include left-wingers, most Democrats, RINOs, many neoconservatives, presstitutes, the Deep State, big business, and Chinese Communists.) As these comparisons show, Bidenites and Deplorables live in different worlds. Overall, Bidenites are inclined to be statists and centralists and want to impose themselves on others and tell them what to do. Consequently, Bidenites do not want to leave the Deplorables alone. Conversely, Deplorables are generally inclined to be libertists and decentralists and want to be left alone.

While Deplorables want to make America great, Bidenites want to make China great. Moreover, Bidenites want to make America in the image of China. Unlike Deplorables, who place the United States first, most Bidenites are globalists and, therefore, prefer foreigners ruling the United States.

Deplorable are producers and favor independence and freedom. Bidenites are parasites and favor dependency and enslavement. While Deplorables prefer making their own decisions, Bidenites prefer having presstitutes, politicians, and bureaucrats making their decisions.

Deplorables seek a rising standard of living. However, Bidenites seek a declining standard of living — at least that is the result of the policies that they promote.

Moreover, Deplorables favor the people possessing the means (arms) to defend themselves from an oppressive government. However, Bidenites prefer standing disarmed before a Hitlerian Trump. They like the idea of people lacking the means to defend themselves from a dictator like Trump.

Furthermore, Bidenites are big promoters of censorship; they want to suppress all speech with which they disagree. Most notable is their demand that neither Trump nor any of his staff be allowed to write any book for publications. Also, they want all Deplorables who write or have written anything favorable about Trump removed from all social media platforms. On the other hand, Deplorables favor free speech — even for Bidenites.

Honest and fair elections are what Deplorables want. Contrastingly, Bidenites want to win elections at all cost — even with massive cheating and stealing if necessary. Thus, they are moving forward to institutionalize election cheating and stealing so that they will never lose another election. While stealing elections, Bidenites preach democracy —they must save democracy by stealing elections.

Whereas Deplorables want justice, Bidenites want vengeance. Deplorables want people like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden tried for the crimes that they have blatantly committed — a justice that has yet to come. (In the case of Biden, he has publicly admitted to a crime.) That the Bidenites want vengeance is evidenced by the impeachments of Trump for crimes that he did not commit and their vindictiveness toward Deplorables.

Many Bidenites want to send Deplorables to concentration camps to be deprogrammed and reeducated and indoctrinated in proper left-wing thought using torture if necessary. Bidenites must resort to such horrific methods because they know that truth, logic, history, and argument is on the side of the Deplorables. Yet, most Deplorables prefer to convert Bidenites with reasoning, logic, and argument although they know that most Bidenites are incapable of reasoning and thinking logically and that Bidenites are incapable of understanding why any sane person would oppose their enslaving, impoverishing, dehumanizing agenda.

Although Bidenites like to brag that they believe in science, the only science in which they believe is politicalized science. Unlike most Deplorables, Bidenites do not accept real science. Most Deplorables act like true scientists: They question the science and know that, with few exceptions, nothing is finally settled scientifically. Contrary to the beliefs of Bidenites, Deplorables know that a consensus does not decide science (the consensus is often wrong). 

When compared with Deplorables, Bidenites generally have a much less sense of humor and a much lower threshold for negative criticism. Also, Bidenites are more narcissistic and fearful than Deplorables.

Moreover, Deplorables typically live more joyful lives than Bidenites, who are typically unhappy and miserable. Whereas Deplorables want Bidenites to “see the light” and recognize and accept the truth, Bidenites want to annihilate the Deplorables. Thus, Deplorables show more compassion and love than Bidenites.

Most Deplorables adhere to the constitution that the founding fathers gave the country. Also, they cherish traditions. On the other hand, nearly all Bidenites prefer the constitution that Lincoln gave the country, which is the current constitution of the United States. Moreover, Bidenites hate traditions and seek to destroy them. (Unfortunately, most Bidenites and Deplorables do not understand the difference between the two constitutions because they look similar. Under the constitution of the founding fathers, the federal government has few specifically delegated powers; all other powers are reserved to the States and the people [bodies politic] thereof. Also, under the constitution of the founding fathers, there were 13 “we the people” (now there are 50 “we the people”). Under Lincoln’s constitution, all power is vested in the federal government, and the States have only those powers that the federal government condescends to grant or allow them. Moreover, there is only one “we the people.”)

While Deplorables want to save what little is left of American and recover what has been lost, Bidenites want to destroy what is left. They want to deliver the coup de grace.

As shown above, the United States are divided into two camps: one that wants freedom, the Deplorables, and one that wants oppression, the Bidenites. Can the two camps be reconciled? Probably not because Bidenites go out of their way to alienate Deplorables. Bidenites do not want to unify the country. Their ultimate goal is the annihilation of the Deplorables and to turn the country over to the globalists under Chinese control.

Copyright © 2021 by Thomas Coley Allen.

More political articles.

Thursday, March 4, 2021

More on the COVID-19 Vaccine

More on the COVID-19 Vaccine

Thomas Allen


Amazingly, but not surprisingly, a large number of people are begging to be vaccinated with an experimental vaccine that the FDA has not approved. Moreover, these people are imploring to take voluntarily an experimental vaccine without compensation, and they assume all the risks. Since the vaccine manufacturers assume no risk, they have little incentive to produce a safe and effective vaccine — especially, since governments are buying all that they can produce. On the contrary, big pharma is incentivized to make vaccines that cause chronic disease, which generates future sales for drugs to treat these diseases and which they seem to have successfully done with the COVID-19 vaccines.

These vaccines are being rushed to market before clinical trials are completed. Consequently, vaccinated people are being used in a large-scale genetic experiment. And this is for a disease with a greater than 99 percent survival rate.

Repeatedly, governmental health officials have said that whether COVID-19 vaccines prevent the spread of COVID-19 is unknown. In the trials, these vaccines were not evaluated for their ability to prevent inflection or transmission of COVID-19. They were evaluated in their ability to lessen moderate to severe symptoms. However, vaccinated primates still contracted COVID-19. Why would anyone want to be vaccinated with a vaccine that may not and probably does not prevent them from catching COVID-19 — especially, since effective and safe treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine and zine, are available to treat the disease?

Even if these vaccines provide some immunity, how long that immunity lasts is unknown. If one can still catch and transmit COVID-19 after vaccination, does it provide any immunity at all?

Moderna and Pfizer make their vaccines from messenger RNA (mRNA). The idea behind these COVID-19 vaccines is that the RNA in the vaccine will enter the cells of the vaccinated person and cause the cells to produce and secrete the spike protein for COVID-19. Then, the body will respond to this viral protein by producing antibodies. However, this technology has yet been proven to work as promoted. Moreover, vaccines using mRNA have never been used in humans. Thus, the long term effects are unknown.

RNA can convert to DNA, and this DNA could become linked to a person’s DNA. That is, the COVID-19 vaccines can make a person into a genetically modified organism (GMO). When the person becomes a GMO, his immune system attacks his body and may cause organ failure.

By the medical definition of “vaccine,” these mRNA vaccines are not true vaccines. Unlike true vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines do not improve a person’s immune response to the infection. Nor do they prevent a person from getting infected. They are experimental gene therapy whose the long-term effects are unknown.

However, mRNA may overstimulate the immune system and cause long-term chronic inflammation (rheumatoid arthritis and Parkinson’s disease are examples of long-term chronic inflammation diseases). Most of the common side effects of these COVID-19 vaccines result in inflammation of the brain.

The mRNA used in the COVID-19 vaccines is synthetic. Natural mRNA deteriorates quickly. To prevent this rapid deterioration, the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines use polyethylene glycol (PEG). Unfortunately, about 70 percent of Americans have antibodies to PEG. According to the FDA, these PEG antibodies may be the cause of anaphylaxis. (Anaphylaxis is a sudden allergic reaction resulting in decreased blood pressure, smooth muscle contraction, and shortness of breath.) Anaphylaxis from the COVID-19 vaccine occurs in about 1 in 45,000, which is about 17 times the rate caused by other vaccines. Thus, some health authorities recommend that people with severe allergic conditions not take the COVID-19 vaccine. Yet, the CDC recommends that these people be vaccinated! However, the CDC does recommend that people allergic to any ingredient of the vaccines not be vaccinated and anyone who has an allergic reaction to the first shot should not take the second shot. 

Others who should not receive COVID-19 vaccines are people with rheumatoid arthritis, Parkinson’s disease, chronic Lyme’s disease, acquired immune deficiency, and similar inflammatory diseases. Also, people who have diseases associated with xenotropic murine leukemia virus (XMRV) should not be vaccinated. (XMRV has been associated with certain cancers, such as prostate cancer, weakened immune systems, autism, and other diseases.). Likewise, people with significant cardiovascular issues should not be vaccinated. Besides people who suffer from the aforementioned diseases, the people most susceptible to the adverse effects from the COVID-19 vaccines are those who take the seasonal influenza vaccines and, because of genetics, Blacks and Hispanics (Indians and mestizoes). 

Moreover, women of childbearing age may risk infertility if they receive these COVID-19 vaccines. (WHO recommends that pregnant women not get the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine because the vaccine may cause late-term miscarriages.)

One important aspect of these COVID-19 vaccines is that they may worsen COVID-19 disease by antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Having received a COVID-19 vaccination could place the vaccinated person at a higher risk of death or injury if he later contracts COVID-19. Likewise, people who have had COVID-19 and then are vaccinated could have a higher risk of death or serious injury.

Furthermore, only a few frail elderly people were used in the clinical trials. The death rate of such people rises after vaccination. Thus, some health experts recommend that the frail elderly not be vaccinated.

Among the many unknowns surrounding these COVID-19 vaccines are how long will the mRNA remain stable in the body. Also, what happens if the mRNA degrades too rapidly, too slowly, or not at all? What happens if the body keeps producing antibodies?

Some health experts believe that the long-term effects of these COVID-19 vaccines will lead to a significant increase in neuroinflammation diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), some types of cancers, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, bladder problems, kidney diseases, psychosis, and sleep disorders.

Of the people who have received the COVID-19 vaccine by December 18, 2020, 2.79 percent suffered one or more health impacts. This compares with a less than 1 percent reduction in infection from the Pfizer vaccine and an overall noninstitutional infection fatality rate of 0.26 percent. (For the Pfizer vaccine, the relative risk reduction may be between 19 and 29 percent, which is less than the 50-percent threshold needed for licensing.)

As mentioned above, the noninstitutionalized infection fatality rate for COVID-19 is 0.26 percent. For people less than 40, the rate is 0.01 percent. So, why assume all the risks that are or may be associated with these experimental COVID-19 vaccines?

Many people are dying or becoming seriously ill from COVID-19 vaccinations. Most of these deaths and injuries are concealed and never reported by the presstitutes. When one of these incidents is posted on a social media site, the site quickly removes it. If such incidents do become public, they are considered coincidental and irrelevant. Unless the death occurs almost immediately after vaccination, it is contributed to another cause. 

Furthermore, nearly all of the people who are reported as dying from COVID-19 died of something else — ventilators being one of the unmentioned, important causes of death and terror and isolation being other important, unmentioned causes. No virus is needed.

Based on the effort that politicians, presstitutes, big tech, governmental health officials, establishment scientists, and others have expended to silence people who have revealed potential dangers and problems of these COVID-19 vaccines and even people who question their safety and effectiveness, these vaccinations cannot survive examination. Such attacks against scientists, health experts, and others should make people highly suspicious of the safety and effectiveness of these COVID-19 vaccines.

All of this for a virus that no one has ever isolated and identified. No one has ever proven that COVID-19 exists.

Political leaders, health officials, and presstitutes have continuously and habitually lied about the so-called COVID-19 pandemic (when deaths from suicide and drug overdose are removed, deaths in 2019 exceed deaths in 2020 in the United States — so where is the pandemic). Why would they not also lie about the COVID-19 vaccines?


References

Mercola, Dr. Joseph. “Fauci Now Says COVID-19 Vaccine May Become Mandatory Analysis.” https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/19/covid-19-vaccine-may-become-nnandatory.aspx?ui=684b40cdac888b48995fb5507fa... Accessed January 19, 2021.

Mercola, Dr. Joseph. “How COVID-19 Is Changing the Future of Vaccines Analysis.” https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/12/future-of-vaccines.aspx?ui=684b40cdac888b48995fb5507fa878c3c3a7bf6890156ca... Accessed January 12, 2021.

Mercola, Dr. Joseph. “How COVID-19 'Vaccines' May Destroy the Lives of Millions.” https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/31/covid-19-vaccine-gene-therapy.aspx?ui=684b40cdac888b48995fb5507fa878c3c3a7... Accessed February 1, 2021.

Mercola Dr. Joseph. “Informed Consent for COVID Vaccine.” https://articles.mercola.com/s!tes/articles/archive/2021/01/19/informed-consent-for-covid-vaccine.aspx?ui=684b40cdac888b48995fb5507fa878c3c3. Accessed November 19, 2020.

Mercola, Dr. Joseph. “Side Effects and Data Gaps Raise Questions on COVID Vaccine.” https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/26/covid-vaccine-side-effects.aspx?ui=684b40cdac888b48995fb5507fa878c3c3a7bf689... Accessed January 26, 2021.

Nass, Dr. Meryl. “Pfizer Admits Vaccine Does Not Prevent COVID.” https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/01/29/pfizer-admits-vaccine-does-not-prevent-covid.aspx?ui=684b40cdac888b48995fb5507...Accessed January 29, 2021.

Noorchashm, Hooman, M.D., Ph.D. “Cardiothoracic Surgeon Warns FDA, Pfizer on Immunological Danger of COVID Vaccines in Recently Convalescent and Asymptomatic Carriers.” January 28, 2021. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/surgeon-warns-fda-pfizer-immunological-danger-covid-vaccines-convalescent-asymptomatic-carriers/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastC ontent&e!d=9a687b92-5f4c-4559-91e9-8afbfabbfd7a. Accessed January 29, 2021.

Roberts, Paul Craig. “Think Three Times Before Taking the Covid Vaccine.” https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2021/01/26/think-three-times-before-taking-the-covid-vaccine/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&i. Accessed January 26, 2021.

Copyright © 2021 by Thomas Coley Allen

More political articles.


Wednesday, February 24, 2021

Comments on Wilkin’s The Ten Most Misunderstood Words in the Bible

Comments on Wilkin’s The Ten Most Misunderstood Words in the Bible
Thomas Allen

With The Ten Most Misunderstood Words in the Bible (2012), Robert N. Wilkin has written an interesting and enlightening book. He discusses and explains in detail faith, everlasting, saved, lost, heaven, hell, repentance, grace, gospel, and judgment. Also, he briefly discusses eleven other often misunderstood words. Below are several questions, observations, and comments about his discussions.

1. One of the attributes of God is that He is omnipresent: He is everywhere simultaneously. Nowhere and no place exists where He is not. Nothing exists where He is not. If there is somewhere or something where He is not, then He is not omnipresent.

Therefore, He has to fill every void, every particular, every wave, every energy, every force, every spirit, and every whatever simultaneously, including the Lake of Fire (what most people mistakenly called Hell) and even Satan himself. Since the inhabitants of the Lake of Fire, the unbelievers, are tormented forever, then beings tainted with a sin nature exist forever. They have everlasting life. How can God, whose holiness is beyond our comprehension, tolerate the everlasting sin nature of unbelievers? Further, how can He tolerate the everlasting existence of Satan and his gang of fallen angels?

2. Wilkin is an adherent of the free grace doctrine of salvation. Thus, he claims that everlasting life is obtained by believing in Jesus for it. Then, he claims that unbelievers are tormented forever in the Lake of Fire. To be tormented forever requires unbelievers to have everlasting life so that they can endure everlasting torment. Consequently, based on Wilkin’s description of believers and unbelievers, all humans have everlasting life once they are conceived. This means that humans must be innately immortal. Though the physical body dies, the conscience essence lives forever.

If belief in Jesus and a lack of belief in Jesus determine where believers and unbelievers spend their everlasting lives — the New Earth or the Lake of Fire — then believing in Jesus does not guarantee everlasting life. Humans already have that. Therefore, believers do not obtain everlasting life by believing in Jesus. Being innately immortal, they already have everlasting life. Belief and the lack of belief merely determine their ultimate destination, where they will spend their everlasting life. (If a believer obtains everlasting life by believing in Jesus, does an unbeliever obtain everlasting life by not believing in Jesus?)

Some of the doctrines that Wilkin condemns, such as annihilation, overcome the problem of humans being innately immortal, having everlasting life. Contrary to Wilkin’s doctrine, they really do have Jesus giving everlasting life to people who believe in him for it.

3. I have always been told that the New Earth (what most people mistakenly called Heaven) is a place of everlasting happiness, joy, bliss, contentment, serenity,  peacefulness, etc. It is a place without sorrow, sadness, suffering, etc. How can one live forever in peaceful bliss, etc. knowing that one’s spouse, children, siblings, parents, and other relatives and close friends are tormented forever? Such a person would naturally feel sadness, sorrow, etc. Moreover, how can a truly compassionate empathic believer find peaceful bliss void of sorrow in the New Earth while knowing unbelievers are tormented forever in the Lake of Fire?

(According to Wilkin, Heaven or more correctly Paradise is not the permanent residence for believers; the New Earth is. Before Jesus’ ascension, Paradise is that part of Hades or Sheol where believers stay temporarily, and after Jesus’ ascension,  Paradise is that part of the third heaven where believers stay until their judgment. Furthermore, Hell is not the permanent residence for unbelievers; the Lake of Fire is. Hell is that part of Hades or Sheol where unbelievers stay temporarily until their judgment.)

4. Wilkin argues that repentance refers to temporal life and never to avoiding eternal condemnation in the Lake of Fire. Further, he claims that repentance leads to a longer and better physical life.

This conclusion seems questionable. If people who abuse recreational chemicals and pharmaceutical drugs are omitted, the “good” seem to live no longer than  unrepentant “bad” persons. On the contrary, the opposite often seems true. The old saying that “the good die young” came into being because people noticed that many good people die young while really evil people, including Satanists and Luciferians, live into their late 70s and 80s and even 90s.

This rule that repentance leads to a longer and better life seems to have as many exceptions as the “‘i’ before ‘e’ except after ‘c’ or when sounding like ‘a’, as in neighbor or weigh” rule. This rule has more words that are exceptions than words that comply with it. Perhaps, someday someone will do a study to find out if repentance results in a statistically significantly longer life and a more healthy, prosperous, and joyful life.

5. Wilkin notes that in the world to come, the police, jailers, lawyers, thieves, and other occupations related to the criminal justice system cease to exist because they are not needed in a sinless world. He also notes that some believers will be rulers. The legitimate function of government is to protect life, liberty, and property from trespasses from others, and, much beyond this, the government morphs into a state, which is a form of idolatry. (For example, public works not paid for by user fees, public education, and public welfare are the actions of a state.) Since no real government will be needed, what is the function of these rulers? Is it to feed their egos by giving them people to boss?

Moreover, being God the Son, Jesus is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Therefore, why does he need anyone to assist him in ruling? If Jesus does not need any assistant rulers, what is the purpose of making some rulers, other than feeding their egos so that they can boast “I made the cut and you didn’t?”

6. Since the streets of the New Jerusalem are paved in gold, women will not be able to wear high heels when they cross a street. Moreover, transportation will be difficult, unless some kind of antigravity form of transportation is used. Because of its malleability, Gold is too soft for pavement.


Copyright © 2021 by Thomas Coley Allen.

More religious articles.

Monday, February 22, 2021

Some Comments on Race and Ethnicity

Some Comments on Race and Ethnicity 

Thomas Allen

 

Discussed below are the difference between race and ethnicity, the invalidity of genetic testing for racial and ethnic ancestry, Yankees and Northerners, and albusphobes.

Race and Ethnicity

Human races are species and, therefore, are biologically and genetically like any other species. A racial type is like a variety or subspecies. An ethnic group is a cultural subdivision of a human race. For example, Melanochroi (Homo brunus) is a species of man. Among its varieties are Saharan-Hamite, Eastern-Hamite, Egyptian, Oriental, Dravidians, and Indo-Iranian. Its ethnicities include the Fellata, Ethiopian, Fellahin, Bedouin, Tamil, and Baluchi.

A major difference between race and ethnicity is its life. With a few exceptions, a race lasts forever after God creates it if Revelation is given a broad interpretation. According to Revelations 7:9, a great multitude out of every nation, of all tribes, peoples, and tongues stand before the throne of God and before the Lamb, Jesus. Unless all these nations, tribes, and peoples are of the same race (species of man), then all extant races should have representatives in the kingdom to come. (Some species of man have become extinct, such as Neanderthal and the giants like the Nephilim. Whether any of them are in heaven is unknown. However, if the Universalists are correct, they along with all other humans will be there.)

On the other hand, ethnicities are transitory. They are born and later die, at least on earth, although they may survive for thousands of years. Nevertheless, Revelations shows that many ethnicities (nations, tribes, and peoples) will last forever.

Ethnic and Racial Ancestry

Various companies promote discovering one’s ethnic (Pole, Japanese, Zulu, Tuaregs, etc.) and racial (Aryan, Melanochroi, Turanian, Negro, Indo-Australian, and Khoisan) makeup. This is done by comparing a person’s genetic sample to genetic samples of various ethnic and racial groups.

For this comparison to be valid, a person’s genetic sample has to be compared with a standard. Furthermore, the standard has to be pure with no admixtures from any other ethnic or racial group. Thus, for validity, a pure and unpolluted gene pool is needed for Poles, Japanese, Zulu, Tuaregs, and each of the hundreds of other ethnic groups.

On the other hand, we are told that no pure ethnicities or races exist. Everyone is a mongrel. All ethnicities and races are mixtures of each other. If true, then discovering one’s ethnic and racial ancestry by genetics is a hoax and a waste of resources.

Yankee and Northerner

Most Whites in the United States who originate outside the South fall into two groups: the Yankee and the Northerner. Yankees are Whites who fit the description given in “The Puritan Yankee,” “The Yankee,” and “Cusson’s Description of the Yankee” all by Thomas Allen. Whites originating outside the South who do not fit the description of the Yankee are Northerners. (During Lincoln’s War, many Northerners were called “Copperheads.”) Like Southerners who are not scalawags, Northerners are deplorables. Although inferior in number, Yankees are superior in power and influence. Unfortunately, many Northerners follow the lead of the Yankees, which results in confounding the two because it makes these Northerners almost indistinguishable from the Yankees. Consequently, Yankees and Northerners are often confused and used as synonyms.

Albusphobes

Albusphobia is an intense aversion for the Homo albus species of humans, i.e., an intense aversion for the Aryan or White race. Luciferians, self-hating H. albus, and racial nihilists are the three major types of Whites who are albusphobes. Luciferians are mostly found in the ruling elite and their underlings. They seek to offer the H. albus species to Lucifer, their master, because it is the species created in the image of God. Self-hating H. albus (self-hating Whites) hate their species so much that they seek its annihilation. Many progressives and liberals and some libertarians are self-hating H. albus. The largest group is the racial nihilist. Racial nihilists are indifferent to the existence of all human species, especially H. albus. They do not consider any human species worth preserving, especially H. albus. Most Whites are, or at least act like, racial nihilists.

Many nonwhites are albusphobes. A few nonwhites are Luciferians. Some are racial nihilists. Others are so albusphobic that they are willing to sacrifice their own species to genocide H. albus. However, many nonwhites are not albusphobic per se; they merely seek to preserve and promote their own species. Most nonwhite albusphobes are averse to the H. albus species but not to the extent of scarifying their own species to genocide H. albus. This group desires and seeks the death of H. albus without sacrificing themselves.

Because White albusphobes have united with nonwhite albusphobes to genocide H. albus, H. albus is doomed to extinction. Only if Whites begin loving their own species as much as nonwhites love theirs and began promoting the preservation of H. albus, can H. albus be saved from extinction.


Copyright © 2021 by Thomas Coley Allen.

More social issues articles.


Tuesday, February 16, 2021

Some Observations

Some Observations

Thomas Allen


The following are some observations on Deplorables and Bidenites and their behavior and attributes. (Bidenites are the supporters, promoters, and owners of Biden and include left-wingers, most Democrats, RINOs, many neoconservatives, presstitutes, the Deep State, big business, and Chinese Communists.) 


Upside Down America

According to Marxist theory, the plutocrats, aristocrats, cryptocracts, and corporatocracts use the government to suppress the proletarians, peasants, workers, and common people. The plutocrats, etc. are identified with right-wingers, and the proletarians, etc. are identified with left-wingers. However, in today’s America, this notion has been turned upside down. The right-wing, the Deplorables, are the proletarians, peasants, workers, and common people. Bidenites, the left-wing, identify with the plutocrats, aristocrats, cryptocracts, and corporatocracts; these are the people who own the Democratic party and the Bidenite political leaders.


The Capitol Vandalism Verses the White House Siege

Antifa agitators and some stupid Trump protesters are let into the Capitol building. Unfortunately, some of them, most likely Antifa operatives, vandalized the building. This act is called a siege, insurrection, and storming the Capitol — an attempt to overthrow the federal government. Consequently, the Bidenites now consider all Deplorables to be traitors and terrorists and are moving forward to codify this accusation in law.

On the other hand, with the election of Trump, Black Lives Matter sieged the White House resulting in the injury of more than 60 secret service agents. This siege lasted three days and caused numerous injuries and the burning of buildings. Yet, this act is called a justifiable, peaceful protest.

When people protested Trump’s election in 2016, the protest was called a justifiable, peaceful protest and was encouraged. Yet, when people protested Biden’s election in 2020, the protest was called an insurrection and sedition and was condemned.


Who Is the Real Nazi

Bidenites accuse Trump and Deplorables of being Nazis (national socialists) or fascists. Who is the real Nazi or fascist: Trump and the people whom he represents, the Deplorables, or Biden and the people whom he represents, the Bidenites? (Nazis and fascists are brothers and are closely related to communists, democratic socialists, state capitalists, and other types of socialists.)

Nazis are known for using violence to intimidate their opponents and to terrorize the general population. Who has used such intimidation: the Bidenites or the Deplorables? The answer is the Bidenites with their Black-Lives-Matter and Antifa riots. They even incited the assault on the Capitol building to terrorize those larcenous, sniveling, cowardly recreants called Senators and Representatives. Except for the stupid Deplorables who were beguiled into joining Antifa to vandalize the Capitol, Deplorables have not been involved in large-scale violence unlike the Bidenites, who have. Trump’s MAGA rallies have always been peaceful — at least on the part of the Deplorables. Unlike Bidenites, Deplorables have not rioted, looted stores, burned buildings, attacked the police, or injured innocent bystanders. Thus, Biden and the Bidenites have behaved much more like Nazis than have Trump or the Deplorables when it comes to using violence to advance their agenda.

Nazis are known for controlling the media and suppressing the opposition’s ability to inform the public. Who controls the media and who is trying to suppress their opposition’s ability to communicate with the public: the Bidenites or the Deplorables? During the time of Trump’s campaign and his presidency, Bidenites have controlled the media. All that is available to the Deplorables are some minor media outlets. Whereas Bidenites have deplatformed, canceled, and silenced Deplorables, Deplorables have not deplatformed, canceled, or silenced Bidenites. Thus, Biden and the Bidenites have behaved much more like Nazis than Trump or the Deplorables when it comes to controlling the media and suppressing the opposition’s ability to inform the public.

Nazis are known for wanting to disarm the people by prohibiting or highly restricting the private ownership of firearms. Who wants to disarm the people and, by that, make it more difficult for the people to defend themselves from a despotic government: the Bidenites or the Deplorables? The answer is the Bidenites. Deplorables are heavily armed and do not want any more restrictions placed on gun owners. On the contrary, they want fewer restrictions on buying and owning guns. However, Bidenites, who now control the government, do not trust an armed citizenry because it can more effectively resist the despotic agenda of the Bidenites than can a disarmed citizenry. Consequently, Bidenites want to make gun ownership more difficult and eventually want to confiscate most privately owned guns (only the politically privileged elite and the government would be allowed to own guns). Thus, Biden and the Bidenites have behaved much more like Nazis than Trump or the Deplorables when it comes to disarming the people by prohibiting or highly restricting the private ownership of firearms.

Nazis are known for heavily regulating businesses. Who wants to regulate businesses heavily: Biden and the Bidenites or Trump and the Deplorables? Again, the answer is Biden and the Bidenites. Trump with the approval and support of most Deplorables reduced regulations on businesses. Biden with the approval and support of most Bidenites is moving forward with heavily increasing regulations on businesses. Thus, Biden and the Bidenites have behaved much more like Nazis than Trump or the Deplorables when it comes to regulating businesses.

Nazis are known for controlling and stealing elections. Who stole the last election and who is moving forward with a law that will guarantee that the Democratic party never loses another election: Biden and the Bidenites or Trump and the Deplorables. Obviously, the answer is Biden and the Bidenites. Most of Biden’s campaigning was from his basement. When he did venture out into the public to campaign, his audience seldom exceeded a few dozen (and this is being generous). Yet, he defeated the most popular man in the country, whose campaign crowds were measured in the thousands and tens of thousands in a country that was locked down. Trump was leading in the closely contested States when the vote counting was halted and the Republican observers were ushered out of the buildings only to have the counting to start again without the observers present and boxes of newly discovered ballots marked for Biden were found after which Trump fell behind—such is an honest election according to Bidenites. Thus, Biden and the Bidenites behaved much more like Nazis than Trump or the Deplorables when it comes to elections. 

Based on the above criteria, Biden and the Bidenites act much more like Nazis than do Trump and the Deplorables.

Copyright © 2021 by Thomas Coley Allen.

More political articles.


Monday, February 8, 2021

Two Great Black Leaders

Two Great Black Leaders
Thomas Allen

Antony Johnson and Stokely Carmichael are two great Black leaders who are seldom discussed, even during Black history month. Yet, both have made great contributions to America and American history. Johnson has the honor of being the man who introduced African slavery in what is now the United States. Thus, he gave Blacks a perpetual excuse for all their shortcomings and failures: slavery. Also, Blacks found that slavery was an excellent tool to use to get Whites to grant Blacks Black power and supremacy. To Carmichael goes the honor of leading his people out of the darkness of White power and supremacy into the light of Black power and supremacy. Because of his labor, America now enjoys Black power and supremacy.

Anthony Johnson
Anthony Johnson was a most remarkable Black man, who may hold the record for the most firsts in Virginia. Yet, most likely, one may never hear about this extraordinary man.

Johnson was among the first group of Blacks to land in Virginia, and he may have been the first Black man to set foot on Virginia soil. He was the first free Black in Virginia. (When the first Blacks landed in Virginia, they were treated like indentured servants from Europe. Once they had worked for another for a specific number of years to pay for their passage, they were set free.) Also, he was the first Black landowner and established the first Black community.

Here is the reason that one never hears about Johnson: He was the father of slavery in Virginia and the first slave owner in Virginia. He became a slave owner when he refused to release one of his Black indentured servants, Jim Casor, after he had served the term of his contract. Johnson convinced the court that he was entitled to the lifetime service of Casor. Thus, Johnson brought slavery to Virginia.
(Johnson achieved his court ruling making Casor a slave in 1655, and Virginia enacted its first law to legalize slavery in 1661. However, Massachusetts led both Johnson and Virginia in legalizing slavery when it enacted its slavery law in 1641.)

Stokely Carmichael
Stokely Carmichael is one of the greatest Black leaders ever and should be heralded above even St. Martin Luther King the Divine, who has been elevated above Jesus. He saw an enormous opportunity, and he took advantage of it. Even today, the United States are enjoying the fruits of his labor and will continue to enjoy his work for decades to come. After seeing how the United States surrendered unconditionally to King and his Communist comrades, Carmichael recognized a void that needed filling — and fill it he did.

By 1967, most Whites had become racial nihilists and were practicing the new morality of sacrificing the White race on the altar of humanity. White supremacists and White preservationists were so few that they no longer had a voice in political, social, or economic matters.

Like most Blacks, Carmichael was a disciple of the old morality of preserving, protecting, and promoting his race. Consequently, he began to promote Black supremacy to replace the now-dead White supremacy. As a result, Black supremacy has brought Blacks privileges that White never had under White supremacy. Thus, Blacks receive all sorts of preferential treatments, such as quotas, set-asides, lower standards, and efforts to recruit Blacks. They even have agencies of the federal government whose primary purpose is to promote and protect these special rights, privileges, and immunities that Blacks have while denying them to Whites. (For a list of 75 such privileges, see “Black Privileges” by Thomas Allen.)

As Black supremacy has advanced, the White race and Western Civilization has faded. Today, only Black lives matter. Whites are nothing more than a cancer, a blight on humanity.

Carmichael was born in 1941 in Trinidad. In 1956, he moved to the United States with his parents and became a US citizen the following year. In 1964, he graduated from Howard University with an A.B. He became an activist in the so-called civil rights demonstrations in 1960 with a sit-in demonstration. The following year, he joined a “freedom-ride” in Mississippi. This demonstration led to a 49-day jail sentence for him.

Carmichael became the head of the Student Nonviolence Coordinating Committee (SNCC, which is called “Snick”). In this position, he rose to national prominence. Under Carmichael’s leadership, SNCC organized riots in Puerto Rico and in Selma, Nashville, Atlanta, and other Southern cities.

At the urging of Martin Luther King, SNCC was organized to manage sit-ins, “freedom rides,” and related demonstrations, which came common throughout the South. It was the militant arm of King’s civil rights movement. King would go into a community and present his demands. If the community did not surrender unconditionally to King, SNCC would come into the community and riot and loot until it capitulated to King’s demands. Although it claimed to be nonviolent, SNCC used violence and the threat of violence to achieve its goals. Like nearly all civil rights organizations, SNCC was closely associated with Communists. (SNCC was the Black Lives Matter of its day.)

Carmichael helped organize the Black Panther Party in Mississippi and New York City. In 1966, he began earnestly promoting Black power. Promoting Black power, he expressed vehement hatred for all Whites.

Carmichael allied with Fidel Castro and other leftist leaders.  At a conference of the Communist’s Latin American Solidarity Organization, he urged a revolution to turn the Western hemisphere into one country. He also promoted guerrilla warfare in the United States with Negroes returning from Vietnam being the soldiers for this war.

In 1968, SNCC dismissed Carmichael because of the differences between the two. However, the disagreement was not about equating Black power with Black violence. Nevertheless, Carmichael left SNCC with its rallying cry: “To hell with  America . . . [which is] racist from top to bottom, from left to right.”

Carmichael was a leader of the riots in Washington, D.C., following the assassination of King. The following year, Carmichael began distancing himself from the Black Panthers because the organization was seeking to contaminate itself with White activists. Then, he moved to Africa and formerly condemned the Black Panthers for not being separatist enough. For the last 30 years of his life, he devoted himself to the All-African People’s Revolutionary Party. Carmichael died in 1998.

Sayings of Carmichael
“We want black power! Every courthouse in Mississippi ought to be burned down to get rid of the dirt.”

“I don’t ever want to hear you apologizing for a black man. Don’t you apologize for anyone who’s driven to throw Molotov cocktails. And don’t you call them riots, call them rebellions, for that's what they are.”

“I don’t think black people ought to wait to get the vote. . . . You ought to get together and tell the [white] man that if you don’t get the vote you’re going to bum down this city. Tell him, ‘if we don’t get the vote you’re not going to have a Washington, D.C.’”

“They’re building stores in Cleveland with no windows. It just means we have to move from Molotov cocktails to dynamite.”

“This nonviolence bit is just a philanthropic handout. I don’t see why people keep thinking about that. The violence is inevitable. I don’t try to stop the fight. I try to prepare the people I am organizing so that when the right time comes they will be able to win it. Our country does not run on reason; it is run on violence. That’s the reality of how things are done here. It is to my benefit to get the Negro out on the streets to stop the machine which is keeping me from my rights. Whether they do it by marching, singing, dancing or fighting is irrelevant.”

“Any time they give a black man a gun and tell him to shoot his enemy and he don’t shoot Lurleen and George and little junior [the Wallaces], he’s a fool. Lurleen Wallace is your enemy. These white helmeted cops are your enemies.”

“I tried it [non-violence] for five years and now he [a policeman] is no longer going to beat his humanity into my head. If he touches me, I’m going to kill him.”

“We do not want peace in Vietnam. We want the Vietnamese people to defeat the United States.”

“We will win our rights or we are going to burn the country [U.S.A.] down to the ground.”

“In Newark we applied tactics of the guerrillas. We are preparing groups of urban guerrillas for our defense in the cities. The price of these rebellions is a high price that one must pay. This fight is not going to be a simple street meeting. It is going to be a fight to the death.”

"Afro-Americans in the United States have a great deal of admiration for you [Che Guevara, Fidel Castros’ hatchet man]. We eagerly await your writings in order to digest them and to plan our tactics based on them.”

“Our [American Negroes’] struggle is not confined to the boundaries of the United States. We are for a truly United States of America from Tierra del Fuego to Alaska.”

“Yankee imperialism has existed too long. We [Negroes] are ready to destroy it from the inside. We hope you [Latin Americans] are ready to destroy it from the outside. We must join those who are for armed struggle throughout the world. . . . As we develop our revolutionary conscience, we must begin to develop urban guerrilla warfare. We are ready to meet the savagery of the white United States with arms.”

“We must internationalize our struggle and if we are going to turn into reality the words of Che to create two, three, and more Viet Nams, we must recognize that Detroit and New York are also Viet Nam.”

“[American Negroes] are taking the offensive now. They want to settle the score and will kill first and aim for the head. We must take our vengeance against the leaders of the United States. We don’t know if our people are ready yet, but our list is ready: McNamara, Dean Rusk, Johnson, etc.”

“The United States has taught us how to kill. Our brothers returning from Vietnam are going to use that training well in the cities of the United States.”

“[Negro guerrillas] must develop a consciousness so that when people who are struggling get killed, the retaliation will be against the leaders of the West. Let us develop a consciousness that when they touch one guerrilla, Lyndon Johnson, Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara and Harold Wilson must pay the price. We are not waiting for them to kill us. We will come to kill them first or rather, we are working towards that goal. We have no alternative but to use aggressive armed force, violence, in order to own the land, houses and stores inside our communities and to control the politics of those communities.”

"The only way the Negro in Alabama will get justice is to smash the Democratic  Party. . . . We have the power to smash (it). . . . I want to work toward 1972. By then the Negroes should be organized as an independent force."

“When you talk of Black Power, you talk of bringing this country to its knees.”

“The Black Man is sick and tired of being held as a slave of the White man’s imperialism; the American Negro no longer owes any allegiance to the American capitalist society, and in this fight for liberation he will align himself only with international forces sympathetic to our movement.”

“We (Black Power) will align with any foreign power that will help us in our fight for self-determination', and join us in the total destruction of capitalist imperialism.”

“We're going to shoot the cops that are shooting our black brothers in the back in this country. That’s where we're going.”

“The white man is a devil!”

(The above quotations are from Francis X. Gannon, Biographical Dictionary of the Left, Consolidated Vol. I, 1969, pp. 269-271; Wes Andrews and Clyde Dalton, The Black Hammer: a Study of Black Power, Red Influence and White Alternatives, 1967, pp. 31, 49, 75, 92.)

Copyright © 2020 by Thomas Coley Allen

More history articles.